Mentholated Cigarettes :(

Cigarettes.  As any listener to our podcast knows, it takes only the mere mention of these repulsive products to get me on a rant.  So this week NEJM gave me the opportunity with two perspectives on mentholated cigarettes, a device of the devil if ever there was one.

Here's the background:  in 2009 the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act was passed, giving the FDA power to regulate certain tobacco products with the goal of protecting the public's health.  As is the case with many other drugs and devices, Congress then effectively tied the agency's hands by exempting menthol flavored cigarettes from this act.

If you're not a smoker, or even if you are, you may not know that menthol-containing brands of cigarettes account for 30% of the domestic cigarette market.  The Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee, which was created by the act cited above, recently released a report citing studies showing that the addition of menthol to cigarettes soothes the throat of a new smoker, making the experience of drawing smoke into one's lungs less unpleasant, and therefore ensuring that the neophyte smoker will continue to smoke and become addicted. The addition of menthol also makes smoking cessation more difficult. Yet the report concluded, in decidedly wimpy language, "Removal of menthol cigarettes from the marketplace would benefit public health in the United States," but did not make a specific recommendation to the FDA.  Thus the agency has no leg to stand on in attempting to regulate these products. 

The political wranglings that led to the ultimate exclusion of mentholated cigarettes from regulation reads like many other exposes of the political machine so effectively governing our country.  Sickening, really.  Especially imaginative was the creation of a straw man to bolster the argument that menthol should be excluded:  that of the development of a potential  black market for such cigarettes.

To be fair, there is research clearly demonstrating that when desired products are regulated or taxed heavily, such markets develop and people find ingenious ways to escape such strictures.  Research from Johns Hopkins shows, for example, that many people use the Internet to find Native American reservations and the like to purchase cigarettes less expensively, since they aren't taxed to the same degree as those available locally in many states.  Yet it is my firm conviction that such behavior simply argues for a robust federal tax on ALL cigarettes, or better yet, abolishment of cigarettes altogether.

Indeed, when I reflect on the simple existence of cigarettes at all I shudder.  How is that as a society we allow a product to be sold that has absolutely no benefit to anyone outside of cigarette manufacturers and their stockholders, but causes abundant harm? And this is not just harm to individuals but to all of us in the form of lung cancer, emphysema, heart disease, and early death, reflected in health insurance costs and personal suffering.  Empowered to make just one public health decision, I would abolish cigarettes right now.  Okay, rant over.

Other topics this week include a lack of benefit seen in screening for ovarian cancer in JAMA, and two others from NEJM: a new agent for breast cancer prevention and successful management of hepatitis C treatment via telemedicine.  Until next week, y'all live well.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }


seksi April 11, 2013 at 1:23 pm

I'm really impressed with your writing talents as neatly as with the format in your blog. Is this a paid topic or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to look a nice blog like this one these days..


Men Using The Fleshlight March 3, 2013 at 9:25 pm

I have been surfing on-line greater than 3 hours as of
late, but I by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours.

It's lovely worth sufficient for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you probably did, the web might be a lot more useful than ever before.


June March 2, 2013 at 3:09 am

Hello would you mind sharing which blog platform you're working with? I'm going to start my
own blog soon but I'm having a tough time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I'm looking
for something completely unique. P.S Sorry
for being off-topic but I had to ask!


Elizabeth Tracey March 4, 2013 at 1:01 pm

WordPress. Best of luck!


Ka Roof February 25, 2013 at 1:46 am

It's difficult to find well-informed people about this subject, however, you seem like you know what you're talking about!


Solomon Oboyle February 23, 2013 at 11:19 pm

It's fantastic that you are getting thoughts from this paragraph as well as from our discussion made at this place.


Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Johns Hopkins Medicine does not necessarily endorse, nor does Johns Hopkins Medicine edit or control, the content of posted comments by third parties on this website. However, Johns Hopkins Medicine reserves the right to remove any such postings that come to the attention of Johns Hopkins Medicine which are deemed to contain objectionable or inappropriate content.

Previous post:

Next post: